Independent News for the Oncologist and Hematologist/Oncologist
Last Update: May 17, 2013
Email Register | Forgot Password
Password Remember me
       
Solid Tumors
rss feed
ISSUE: JUNE 2012 | VOLUME: 07:06
Dietary Supplements May Raise Cancer Risk

Dietary supplements have little to no effect in preventing cancer and may increase cancer risk, according to a review published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (2012;104:732-739, PMID: 22534785).

Restricting their review to supplements that have been researched in sufficiently powered clinical trials or large observational studies, the authors focused on antioxidants, folate and folic acid, vitamin D and calcium.

Despite early evidence suggesting an anticancer benefit from antioxidants, clinical studies have not borne out that promise, the authors argue. For example, b-carotene does not prevent recurrence of non-melanoma skin cancer (N Engl J Med 1990;323:789-795, PMID: 2202901); b-carotene and vitamin A do not protect against lung cancer (N Engl J Med 1996;334:1150-1155, PMID: 8602180); vitamins C and E do not protect against total cancer incidence (JAMA 2009;301:52-62, PMID: 19066368); and a-tocopherol, vitamin C, and b-carotene do not protect against total cancer or cancer mortality (J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:14-23, PMID: 19116389).

However, several trials have shown evidence of an increased cancer risk from antioxidants, the review authors, led by María Elena Martínez, PhD, at the University of California-San Diego, reported. One such study, conducted in a population at high risk for lung cancer, found a 39% increase in lung cancer incidence in the b-carotene arm compared with the placebo arm (N Engl J Med 1996;334:1150-1155, PMID: 8602180).

Similarly, the authors did not find evidence that folic acid and folate protect against cancer, whereas they did note evidence of increased risk for cancer from long-term folic acid supplementation. They found insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about vitamin D, and “diverse results” regarding calcium.

Many expert groups have reached a “general consensus” that “nutritional supplements have little to no benefit in preventing cancer,” the authors wrote. Even so, much of the public continues to use dietary supplements, a fact that the authors attribute in large part to the marketing influence of supplement manufacturers. The authors call for “efforts by scientists and government officials to encourage the public to make prudent decisions based on sound evidence with respect to the use of dietary supplements for cancer prevention.”

—George Ochoa

Comment on This Article

Disclaimer: This board is intended for non-commercial reader comments. The posting of advertisements or solicitation of any kind is prohibited. Contributors are expected to conduct themselves in an appropriate manner, refraining from personal attacks and profane, course or abusive language. Hit the "Report Abuse" button to report comments that violate the rules and spirit of this board. www.clinicaloncology.com reserves the right to remove without any notice comments that violate the intentions of this board. It is not intended to provide specific medical advice or to take the place of written law or regulations. The owners of www.clinicaloncology.com assume no liability for the comments made on this board.

Comments: (2) show:
cecea... wrote on: 7/27/2012 1:59 PM (EST) 299 days ago

Much of the public with diagnosed with cancer continues to use supplements due to the outcome with conventional chemotherapy being poor to dismal as well as highly toxic, far moreso, than any advertising influence of supplement manufacturers.

(0) |
drshr... wrote on: 6/13/2012 9:39 PM (EST) 343 days ago

By focusing on the failings of vitamin antioxidants, the authors ignore much more promising versions in the form of Resveratrol and Quercetin, to mention just two.

(0) |
More in Solid Tumors